Mechanism class
- Tesamorelin
- Full-length stabilized GHRH analog
- CJC-1295 (No DAC)
- Truncated stabilized GHRH analog (Mod GRF 1-29)
Compound comparison
Both engage the GHRH receptor through the same cAMP-PKA cascade; tesamorelin is the full 44-residue sequence, CJC-1295 (No DAC) the 29-residue fragment. Tesamorelin completed phase 3 and holds an FDA approval; CJC-1295 (No DAC) has no published human phase trial. Designs needing published human pharmacokinetics use tesamorelin; minimal-fragment GHRH-R work uses CJC-1295 (No DAC).
Quick Answer
Sequence length and evidence depth separate these two, not duration. Tesamorelin is the complete 44-residue GHRH sequence carrying a trans-3-hexenoyl cap at the N-terminus (CAS 218949-48-5, 5,136 Da) and holds an FDA approval built on phase 3 trials. CJC-1295 (No DAC), also called Modified GRF (1-29), is the 29-residue receptor-binding fragment with four substitutions (CAS 863288-34-0, 3,367.9 Da) and has no published phase trial behind it. Neither is long-acting; that is CJC-1295 With DAC, a different molecule.


Mechanism class
Receptor target
Peptide length
Stabilizing modification
Development code
CAS number
Molecular formula
Molecular weight
Reported plasma half-life
Highest published human trial stage
Regulatory status
Purity (Peptide.Express)
Tesamorelin compared with CJC-1295 (No DAC) across mechanism, structure and research attributes. Research reference only.
Both molecules bind the same receptor and run the same cAMP-PKA cascade inside the somatotroph. Tesamorelin presents the complete 44-residue GHRH sequence with a trans-3-hexenoyl group attached to the N-terminal tyrosine. CJC-1295 (No DAC) is the 1-29 fragment — the minimal region that still activates GHRH-R — with four substitutions layered on. The position-2 substitution is the one doing most of the work, because it removes the dipeptidyl peptidase IV cleavage site that destroys native GHRH within minutes.
The duration story is widely mangled online, so state it plainly: neither of these is long-acting. Both modifications defend the same N-terminal vulnerability, and both molecules clear in well under an hour. The compound in this family that genuinely circulates for days is CJC-1295 With DAC, which carries a maleimidopropionyl group that binds serum albumin covalently.
Registry records make this easy to confuse — the PubChem record indexed under the bare name "CJC-1295" (CID 91971820, CAS 446262-90-4) reports C165H269N47O46 and 3,647.2 Da, a mass that reflects the DAC-bearing form rather than the 3,367.9 Da No-DAC material.
Reading the mass on a Certificate of Analysis is the practical way to tell which one is in the vial.
The asymmetry that actually matters is evidentiary, and it is large. Tesamorelin completed phase 3 trials and holds an FDA approval; there is a published clinical pharmacology package for it, including the plasma half-life figure quoted above. CJC-1295 (No DAC) has no equivalent.
Its half-life, its receptor affinity relative to native GHRH, and its dose-response behaviour are described in vendor literature and secondary reviews far more often than in primary papers. Setting the two side by side is not setting two comparable datasets side by side, and no head-to-head study of tesamorelin against Mod GRF (1-29) has been published.
Sourced against a ≥99% HPLC purity specification. Third-party Certificates of Analysis are published where on file. Research-grade tesamorelin is not Egrifta and carries none of that product's regulatory review. All material is for in-vitro laboratory research and educational use only.
Length, and the depth of evidence behind each. Tesamorelin is the full 44-residue GHRH sequence protected by a trans-3-hexenoyl group; CJC-1295 (No DAC) is the 29-residue Modified GRF (1-29) fragment carrying four substitutions. Tesamorelin has completed phase 3 trials and holds an FDA approval as Egrifta. CJC-1295 (No DAC) has no published human phase trial at all.
Neither is long-acting, and the honest answer is that only one of them has a published figure. The Egrifta prescribing information reports a tesamorelin plasma half-life measured in tens of minutes after intravenous dosing. For CJC-1295 (No DAC), the roughly 30-minute figure circulating online has no primary pharmacokinetic paper behind it. The days-long half-life belongs to CJC-1295 With DAC.
Tesamorelin, by a wide margin. It has a completed phase 3 programme, a published clinical pharmacology package and an FDA-approved product built on that data. CJC-1295 (No DAC) is documented mainly through preclinical work on GRF(1-29) analogs and secondary reviews. Any comparison of the two is comparing unequal evidence standards.
There is no published rationale for combining them, because they agonise the same receptor through the same cascade — the combination adds a variable without adding a pathway. Research designs that pair compounds in this space almost always pair a GHRH analog with a ghrelin-receptor agonist such as ipamorelin instead.
CJC-1295 (No DAC). It is the GHRH-arm analog most often paired with ipamorelin, because a GHRH-R analog plus a GHSR-1a agonist engages two separate secretion pathways onto the same cell. Peptide.Express supplies that pairing as a single pre-blended vial.
Yes. Sourced against a ≥99% HPLC purity specification. Third-party Certificates of Analysis are published where on file.
Compiled by the Peptide.Express Research Team. Written and reviewed by Peptide.Express Editorial Team. Molecular identity on this page (name, CAS number, molecular formula and molecular weight) is resolved from a single internal entity record and checked against primary registries (PubChem, CAS Common Chemistry) rather than retyped per page. A field with no verified value is left out instead of estimated. Literature is cited to a DOI, PMID or PMCID permalink so every reference resolves to the specific record it names.